The Magazine of the Royal Institute of British Architects

Return to Liverpool
Hugh Pearman
29.09.09

I’ve got to know Liverpool a bit better over the past couple of years – it’s useful having a daughter at university there – and by chance those two years have coincided with the city’s architectural Great Leap Forward.

Which is also, to judge by some of the comments I see written about it, a great leap backwards. Yes, there is more than a little controversy about some of the new buildings in the place. 

So it being the start of the new university year gave me the excuse to go back. I went to look at one of the most controversial of the latest crop: the ferry terminal building by Hamiltons architects, judged the winner of BD’s annual “Carbuncle Cup”. That fenestration is unfortunate, certainly, and the standard of detailing is poor. It’s watered-down Decon, and a bit embarrassing. If that really is the worst today’s architecture can throw at us however, we have nothing to worry about. But the ferry terminal has a rival, now taking shape on the Liverpool waterfront. 

In a spirit of neutral inquiry, I invite you to look at the nearby £120m Mann Island development of offices and apartments, right next to the Three Graces and the new Museum of Liverpool. A project of Countryside Properties, it is very big, it is clad in black glass, there is absolutely no escaping it, and it is rated BREEAM excellent. Its full visual impact is now becoming apparent. Its architects are Broadway Malyan. It has been sliced about a bit in an attempt to reduce its bulk. This is right bang slap in the middle of the World Heritage Site.

My jaw dropped when I saw it, and then went on dropping until it hit my shoes. I’d like to think that it will all somehow aesthetically resolve itself when it is completed. But I don’t have high hopes.  However, in Liverpool there’s plenty to take one’s mind off such things. The Stirling-shortlisted Liverpool One development by BDP with a huge supporting cast of other architects is holding up well. But the best architectural experience of all is provided by Sir Giles Gilbert Scott’s Anglican cathedral. Not only did he win the competition when he was only 23, not only is it almost alarmingly huge, but the journey to the top of its tower – and the view from the top – is stupendous. For one thing, you pass through the bell chamber, where the highest and heaviest peal of bells in the world looks like an upturned Moon rocket. Once on top, you can see right across the Mersey, across the Wirral to Wales on the horizon. You can make sense of all the recent redevelopment. And of course you get an unrivalled view of the other great cathedral of Liverpool, Gibberd’s Roman Catholic space capsule perched on Lutyens’ crypt.

Spend just a few minute up there on Scott’s tower and you realise that it is the topography of Liverpool, as much as its architecture, that makes it great. 

Comments

Nem at 19:46pm on 29.09.09:

Oh indeed it is all bad. And look who thinks it’s terrific:

http://www.defigueiredo.co.uk/Building_Owners_and_Developers.html

Yes, our former Man at English Heretics.

Wayne Colquhoun at 10:02am on 30.09.09:

Unesco and English Heritage should be rounded up and made to live at the Pier Head for this mess. Unfortunately you missed misjudged gravity of the new museum of which the Terminal Ferry building is designed to match. It is strange that The Three Ugly Sisters at Mann Island, or the Three Grotesques are indeed bad but the funding from the museum is directly afforded by this development.

It is in fact noted that the newer the buildings are in Liverpool the worse they are. They promised us Iconic and have delivered us Ichronic right, as you say, slap bang in the middle of a Unesco World Heritage Site.

We at the Liverpool Preservation Trust fought it every step of the way but when Unesco are funded by the DCMS it’s hardly surprising we lost. It is an architectural tragedy what is unfolding.

David Swift at 13:50pm on 01.10.09:

The ferry terminal seems to have been designed as the ugly sister to the new museum. What a blight this is. The museum is a weak attempt at an Oscar Niemeyer design, but 70 years too late. It is fake modernism gone badly wrong. In any event, this is a World Heritage site and deserved some respect. You wouldn’t block the view of the Taj Mahal or the Sphynx with rubbish like this.

Post a response

We will not publish your email address. Comments on stories are pre-moderated.

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.